Sunday, July 6, 2008



an empire of exit strategies

Earlier and earlier these days, the botched bones yaw from rest like coconuts falling, then rise like courtesans called on wearily to dance. In the access panel at the back of the set, there is a smorgasbord of circuits. Tickets to a new life turn out to be VIP passes to last week’s event. A cartoon of carrion crows. Out of the patches of palm trees where we abandoned our tresses for shorter styles, more sheer to the skull, a sense of wastefulness descended right at the moment we stepped into the sun. We cursed the luck that brought us here, then the schedule. It turned out later that they had sent out others to bring us back in, rescuers apparently but crueller than that, more agended, too aware of the glory of the rescuer’s motive for them to be out there simply for us. That frame we roused from sleep and called our own dug deeper, then; grew sullen, threw out its pain in electrical currents, and cried with conviction, I am not a fruit. Although, actually, to be honest, we were browsing bands on YouTube mostly when the weight of that world waltzed in. The ugly story of a ruinous war in the desert made us feel too alive and insane where we were, how we felt already but so much more actual. A Sahara of shattering images shimmered inside of us. In terms of the decisions we don’t make, we decided, any choice is absurd. It can only ever mean what it means, no more and no less. Its equation to itself is the truth that makes no sense to us, we who equate to not quite nothing. Indeed, in size and shape, the doors we pass through are but citadels sliding downward to earth, assuaging zilch. Our bodies are fractious things we govern by proxy, by brains we wish to tamp into our ridiculous flesh like batteries snapped into the back of the remote controllers we christen our selves. Or wait, are our brains the controllers and the batteries our selves? Either way, the analogy is useless when it makes no allowance for alkaline. Perhaps at the open palace, our wrecked, disparaged remains, truly told, will rise above themselves, freed from breathing in an abundance of airs. For now, though, there’s only the problem of sand and the question of getting there. An endless irrigation seems the sole answer on offer. Better dust yourself off while you can in this climate. Our wasteland is perpetually windy.

Monday, June 30, 2008

livelock

Lately i’ve been thinking about my mental state in terms of this idea that stems from computer tech called livelock. The dictionary definition has it so:

livelock parallel
/li:v'lok/: When two or more processes continuously change their state in response to changes in the other process(es) without doing any useful work.
This is similar to deadlock in that no progress is made but differs in that neither process is blocked or waiting for anything.
A human example of livelock would be two people who meet face-to-face in a corridor and each moves aside to let the other pass, but they end up swaying from side to side without making any progress because they always move the same way at the same time.

I find this a constructive destructive concept, a kind of keyword in the fashion of Raymond Williams, maybe, except unlocking nothing. I like the metaphoric model it offers for understanding how variation and stasis can occur simultaneously. More than that, it directly figures how variation and difference can be self-circuited to perpetuate its own total blockage so that stasis itself is the outcome of one's resolved agential efforts. To be more specific, I think perhaps that this idea of changing my current state in response to changes in the other processes around me occurs in a disconnect from any progress, it does not do any useful work because it does not substantively differentiating the impasse. I think this sort of sums up something about how I am, mentally. I think I am locked into doing that human two step with myself when it’s impossible for me to step aside to let myself pass.

I'm really not sure if the self can ever step aside to let itself pass. As in, theoretically, I'm not really sure if that can happen for anyone. Which means that I'm also saying that livelock may be terminal. The question of what way a process may maintain a kind of continuity even as it forsakes it, of what way the self may get beyond itself while retaining an integrity that signals its progression, perhaps strikes at the very heart of the livelock problematic. In relation to this point, there is something else, one other interesting aspect about livelock I read about, that warrants a mention. It involves the corresponding idea of deadlock. A deadlock, in brief, can be defined as "a situation wherein two or more competing actions are waiting for the other to finish, and thus neither ever does." To reiterate, this is a categorical difference from livelock, for, in livelock, no process is blocked or waiting for anything and yet the nature of the activity is such that no progress is made. In computer science, deadlock occurs when two or more processes are each waiting for the other to release a resource in a circular chain. Another human example: two people are drawing diagrams, with only one pencil and one ruler between them. If one person takes the pencil and the other takes the ruler, a deadlock occurs when the person with the pencil needs the ruler and the person with the ruler needs the pencil, before he can give up the ruler. Both requests can't be satisfied, so a deadlock occurs. As it happens, however, in computer science, livelock can occur as a consequence of a set of processes attempting to avoid deadlock. In other words, in acting to avoid a scenario in which they would become deadlocked (say, in the human scenario above, I pluck the pencil from the other person's hand), a livelock is instantiated (the other person plucks the ruler from my hand at the same moment). Thus,

Livelock is a risk with some algorithms that detect and recover from deadlock. If more than one process takes action, the deadlock detection algorithm can repeatedly trigger.

It would be absurd to think of two people plucking ruler and pencil back and forth without end for eternity. The sentience of the two in relation to the simplicity of the problem should (theoretically) allow them to resolve it. If not, no doubt violence would eventually decide the thing. Or exhaustion. But, if the absurdity of the pencil/ruler example cam still be said to apply when it comes to discussing the mind, the simplicity of that example doesn't do justice to what would take place in a mental livelock, to the idea of an algorithm where the complex multiple proceses that are at work in a person's head at any one time, all of them seeking to avoid certain deadlocked outcomes, all livelock by virtue of that very fact into some sort of infinte recursion of pointless animation. This idea of a livelock as the result of the deadlock detection algorithm triggering repeatedly is especially fascinating to me. It could be seen as comparable to the circumstance that arises when one's own busy efforts to free up one's mental resources becomes in itself the means by which one rockets into total resource starvation. In that sense, it's as though the very method by which one patrols to prevent a massive deadlock taking place, that which works so fiercely to circumvent indefinite obstruction, can be tripwired into its own annihilating, self-perpetuating trap. And I must admit I'm not sure what happens when the recovery mechanism becomes stuck like this, that prism a prison. Even this post could be an instant of how wedged it is. I'm not certain an answer is loading.

Friday, June 13, 2008

'My Loose Thread': Interview with Dennis Cooper, September 2005



1. You have said a few times that My Loose Thread was originally going to be a work of non-fiction. Yet, as you remark in one interview, you ultimately came to the conclusion that what you were doing “would be better as a novel”. Why do you think fiction responds better to this topic than non-fiction? You’ve said before that you think of the novel strategically in many ways, a means to your ends. What specifically made you feel that the novel as a form could better articulate your emotions, thoughts and theories on school shootings?

-- I’ve said this elsewhere, I think, but after doing a lot of research on school shootings and not really feeling like I knew how to approach the non-fiction book, I saw the PBS Frontline episode about Kip Kinkel during which they played a tape of his confession straight through with minimal visual information, and I found it emotionally devastating and beautiful, and I realized that it was his inarticulate explanation and grief and hysteria that connected me with the school shootings far more profoundly than any of the information I’d gotten from my research. So I decided to try to simulate my experience with Kinkel’s confession, or as well as I could, and fiction was only way to do that. I realized it was much more important to create an immediate and intimate relationship between the reader and a boy in that situation than to pontificate about the issue the way non-fiction would have forced me to do.

2. What drew you towards writing about the whole school shooting craze in the first place? Did you feel an obligation? In many respects, it seems to me that your work has been on a kind of collision course with Columbine; certainly, it has traversed the same territory for about ten years prior. Also, what innovations did you feel your history as a writer might bring to the topic? Do you think the concerns of your own fiction are in some way uniquely suited to shedding light on this rash of teenage violence? Basically, in an environment where school shootings have spawned their own explanation industry, what did you hope to achieve in My Loose Thread?

-- I guess what drew me towards it was the generalized, distorting, disrespectful media portrayal of the phenomenon, and the fact that people’s idea of how to make the problem go away was to arbitrarily decide the kids were adults and try them as adults so they could potentially be given the death penalty. I was incredibly appalled and angry about that, and I was drawn to do something about the phenomenon because I wanted to treat the kids who did the shootings with the respect as complex individuals that they deserved. I didn’t think consciously about what I could bring to the subject. It was instinctual. I mean I’m very sympathetic to young people, albeit in a subversive way in my work, and I guess I thought I might be able to bring my sympathy and respect for teenagers to the project. That’s all I can say about that really. I wanted to write a book where the reader would be drawn into an intense, private, non-judgemental, emotional relationship with a kid in that situation and then would have whatever personal reaction they had to the protagonist, the story, the phenomenon, the novel.

3. On your website, there’s a really interesting comment you make concerning My Loose Thread. I’ll quote it here:

"I feel like it's a documentary. I wanted it to be like there's this kid's head, and here is the stuff coming out of this kid's head. There's no bullshit, there's no art, and there's no tricks. It's mysterious and confused as he is. It's like this electric wire and this outpouring."

I like this explanation because what you give us with Larry is exactly what you say here: a (fracturing) mind just pouring forth emotion and confusion. But the question comes: why do you think this kind of a documentary approach was most suited to this topic? And how was this related to your decision to switch from reportage to fiction?

-- I wanted the writing to be very barren and reflect Larry’s confusion and hysteria but also have a precision and a kind of threadbare beauty and interest as a piece of writing so as to keep the readers’ attention. Kip Kinkel’s confession was pure poetry but as unselfconscious as speech can be. I wanted that, and since I’m a fiction writer and not a kid freaking out, fiction was the only option I had, so I thought of it as a documentary, and that was one of the rules I used to try to keep the fiction truthful in a way that fiction, by its nature, can’t be.

4. In My Loose Thread, it seems that you gesture carefully to the social co-ordinates which face teenagers: ubiquitous consumption (like the IHOP in chapter one), the hostile school (with its faded bulldog emblem), the indifferent psychiatrist (with his prescription pad) and the dysfunctional parents (a dying father, a drunken mother). Yet my impression is that you don’t see these things as the causes of school shootings but rather the context, the distorted frame of reference for these kids rather than the specific motivation. Would that be correct to your way of thinking?

-- You’re right. They’re context. They’re flavouring. They’re points of reference. I tried to introduce them because they’re expected to exist in relationship to the subject matter, and then I dismissed or disqualified them as best I could. I tried to make them like … you know, like if you’ve fallen in a rushing river and all these rocks and debris are floating by and you want to reach for them to save yourself but you either can’t reach them or they’re too slick to grab hold of or they’re as helpless against the river as you are, but they’re your only points of reference, and they’re your only reminders of where you wish you were, back on land. Something like that.

5. In the course of my reading, I found myself returning over and again to the theme of communication. From his constantly interrupted conversations over the phone to his efforts to explain his relationship with Jim and Rand, Larry’s life is related as a series of failed - or deferred - communications. In fact, language itself is the chief cause of this agony as it is the primary medium through which people relate and yet also that which puts gaps and lies between them. What are your feelings on the role of communication in My Loose Thread? And do you think its failure is itself a chief cause of youth violence?

-- Absolutely. My Loose Thread is only about communication, and is an examination of communication on the level of the characters, the story, the prose, the structure. The characters want desperately to communicate what they think and feel, but they don’t know what they think and feel, and there is no language for confusion. Confusion can only be communicated by damaging language in such a way that it suggests what it is failing to say is more important than what it’s saying. I do that in all my novels, but in My Loose Thread that idea was the forefront. Is its failure a chief cause of youth violence? It’s a big one, but the amnesia of the adult world about what it’s like to be young, and the resentment of the adult world towards those who are young are as big if not bigger culprits.

6. Gilman’s character is a fascinating one precisely because he seems so funny and sad. His plans to shoot up the school are almost in a way like he’s trying to be cool (putting up the Columbine poster on his wall for instance). He’s also real intense about his Nazism but Larry sees it for the bullshit stylistics it is. And in the end the shooting isn’t his crowning moment. An emptiness accompanies his schoolyard murders: he kills just to see if he cares who’s dead. To your mind, what were you aiming at with Gilman’s character? And why did you feel the need to make him separate from Larry? Why not a story about one shooter and one breakdown?

-- That’s hard for me to answer. It’s been a while since I wrote the novel or even read it, and if I tried to explain why Gilman ended up being the character he is, I’d be bullshitting, I think. All the characters were puzzle pieces, and they had to fit together and not seem to be able to fit together, and Gilman took on certain qualities as I built the novel. One of the rules for MLT was that I had to write from beginning to end in a linear way. I’d never written that way before, and I haven’t since. So a number of things developed while I was writing it that I didn’t plan on, such as Gilman doing the shooting. I thought it would be Larry, but it wasn’t right for Larry to do it, and I realized that at a certain point. MLT had a complex strategy and structure in place before I wrote it, but, within all the rules, it’s most intuitive of my novels by far, and so some things happened in a strange way that I can’t really explain except to say it just felt right.

7. Another crucial element to this novel is the relationship between sexuality and identity. Larry’s anxiety over ‘gayness’ is of course part of what sends him over the edge. In fact, it torments him because he can’t relate this thing called ‘gay’ to his intensely complex emotional existence. So, in effect, categories drive him mad: “Names go, then who, then any logic, then the world I understand” (p.38, canongate edition). At the same time, it seems to me that whether Larry is gay or straight is largely besides the point. Larry isn’t really struggling with sexual desire in this book so much as he’s really obsessed with figuring out his desire for people - human depth, the psychological inhabitation of bodies. Thinking about sex for Larry is really a way of trying to think about this. And it is his inability to make sense of it however that leads him down the track to violence. Would you agree with this reading? Would you care to elaborate upon it - or correct it?

-- I totally agree. Larry wants desperately to identify himself as something – gay, straight, a murderer, an abuser of his younger brother, etc. What puts him over the edge is when he realizes he is nothing, and has done nothing bad or good, and cannot be identified. He kills to become something, anything.

8. Time is another significant element in My Loose Thread because within it there is always a constant failure to synchronize. We dip in an out of Larry’s life but there is always a disorientating sense that we have missed something. The reader always comes in too late, just after key events - and then must rely on Larry’s ‘unreliable’ narration to make up for it. In a novel curiously devoid of literary devices, this manipulation of time stands out. How do you feel this relates to what you wanted to convey in your text?

-- Again, you’ve nailed something very important about the novel, and I really can only agree with what you said. In my attempt to write a novel devoid of conventional literary value, time and its signifiers – spacing, rhythm, sentence length, paragraph size, syllable count, etc., etc. -- became one of the few remaining things I could manipulate, and I did with what I hoped was a lot of invisible intricacy. It speaks, like everything else in MLT, to Larry’s exact state of mind and to the state of the reader’s attention span, and pretty much to nothing or little else.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

"our pointed shadows across the whitened fields": the poetry of fred muratori



Fred Muratori is an established and respected North American poet whose poetry remains, however, not very well known. In a strange sense, this odd oversight is serendipitous, as one of the most pressing themes in his poetry tends to be the tension between the effort to establish things – whether it be sense, self, significance, or situation – and what remains unrealised in this, both in the sense of what passes beyond our comprehension and consolidation and in terms of what does not come to fruition, what establishment fails to deliver. Although he has been publishing his work since 1975, with over 175 poems published in some 120 literary journals, Muratori’s verse remains obscure, unheard of by most, perhaps partly because he is the author of only one two published volumes, a limited edition chapbook called The Possible, released in 1988, and one book of poems now 14 years old, Despite Repeated Warnings. A librarian and bibliographer at Cornell University, Muratori is a poet that falls behind the curtain of the academy as an institution of knowledge production, operating not from the lectern but instead out of the place in which the knowledge of the academy resides, is resourced and made possible, namely, the archive. His poems feel inflected with this central and yet concealed positionality. The possibility of what can be done or said, what can be referenced or restored to mind as is promised by the archive, is always set off against the irrevocability of what has been done and said, what has been inscripted in a certain way in the archive or lost to it completely, in Muratori's world and his verse tirelessly investigates the ways in which all directions in our lives are so freighted by this selective, uncompromising history, a history which does not force fate upon things per se but which haloes all attempts at escape with the desperation and beauty of the certitude of their own inevitable foreclosure.

Muratori has not only worked as a bibliographer but as a factory worker, a retailer and a teacher before that – all three of which seem to leak into his poetry as well, not least in the capacity for his language to cross so seamlessly between three distinct modes of discourse: the instructional mode, the worked assemblage, and the sales pitch. His sensibility draws together a scholar’s sober, cloistered speculations, a laborer's keenly practical eye for construction and measurement and a trader's insider familiarity with the nature of desire, turned about and put to use in his work to interrogate the promise of the cure all solution and the language of the quick sell that looms so large in American life.

On the back cover of Despite Repeated Warnings, Muratori’s work is described, in part, as defining "a place where nature, faith and love fail to console". This most certainly cuts to the core of a certain despondency this poetry evinces like soft black rain, a particular emotional resignation in a world where the systems we depend become truly known to us only in the jaws of their very breakdown. Indeed, in response to this disintegration, it may almost seem like Muratori’s writing retreats to a refuge in stoicism as it describes ideals unravelling, prospects unfolding into blank rangeless terminations, people discovering that that they will never be anything other than what they so hopelessly are. However, if one looks closer, it becomes clear that stoicism is less an element of the poetry than the fatigue and the insight into relentlessness that draws one to hold that problematic position in the first place, as if one could become hermetic enough toward the world to ever withstand it. Muratori inserts himself within and before that desire to be closed, to bear the world in silent isolation, to be stoic, and in inventing so many scenarios in which something is undercut, something becomes lost, or something arrives ruined, despite stoicism, he pulls apart the possibility of a stoic response altogether, forcing us back out into the actual trauma of irrevocability and what it means to continue in the face of things that cannot be taken back, including the ways we acted ourselves. His words can almost seem like ice they’re so immaculate and frozen but they burn and the searing sensation the coldness causes is the point.

As a poet, I find Muratori to be of such interest to me because his work is so intrepidly wedded to a certain refusal to think any loss or pain without the presence or sensitivity that remains behind to feel it; the absence or obliteration is always lensed through the resolute remainder, the scattered but irrefutable sentience – which is us – that comes to know it is so transparently there through the violence and incompleteness it is forced to repeatedly experience. In my personal favourite poem of his, 'On the Third Day', he says, "Regret was not invented or designed from need. It / was crosshatched in our molecules, embedded in soil, / waiting for attention." This notion that the irrevocable is cellular, environmental and awaiting cognition – not the simple effect of the mind’s awareness but the precondition for it – is vital for, in this statement, we have one of the key notions of his work: that the way we miswrite and are miswritten into our lives is an inhabitation constantly structured by its determination in the form of choice itself so that remorse is the understanding that we have operated inside contingency incorrectly and that this is the very definition of consequence for us all. In this sense, regret was most certainly not invented or designed from need but from preference, as it is not history alone that ruins us so absolutely but also the history-making process of our meagre freedom-making efforts, that longing to liberate ourselves which binds us up so precisely in the barbed wires of the disaster we’re always trying to abscond from, bringing the futility of our efforts back to our attention in the form of our capacity to try.

It must be added that Muratori’s vision is not fatalistic, however. No, it is far too reconciled to the ruthlessness of how open the universe actually is to simply declare that everything is decided for us. As he notes in his new work, Nothing in the Dark, a co-optation of the noir form into the structure of the prose poem, as hermetic as one wishes to become, as pure a product of one’s own directedness through the days, like an arrow toward a target, the operations of the unforseen and the unseen traumatically intrude to radicalise you with possibility again and again. He writes:

"I observe, I act, I observe myself acting, I record the observations in something approximating a dream diary. I discover evidence, connections that can't be diagrammed, only assumed from variations in the patterned behaviors of others. Two of Felice's fingernails are chipped. They were not chipped yesterday. Something has happened. Something new has entered the known universe, and once again that universe is open to question."

This observation is critical. Although the ‘I’ of this piece presents itself mechanistically, as a sort of notation device for its own activity, this notation effectively providing the reason it acts at all, to trace its own map, it finds it cannot close itself off enough in this reporting. The universe is open again to question – to interrogation, not registration – in the doubled figure of the two chipped nails that carry information of an event that happened elsewhere, outside the scope of one’s own sentient recordings. The "variations in the patterned behaviors of others", of the "connections that cannot be diagrammed", except to say that they exist and cannot be diagrammed, is what renders meaning meaningful, is what precludes some sort of retreat into a world where – because we have expectations of it in advance – hurt does not have to happen. Something else is always happening somewhere, history is eternally plotting arbitrariness against you and you cannot avoid it. And, despite repeated warnings, it compels us to relent, to become agents in the world, to submit to it and thus become active inside of it for action is always carried out in the shadow of the unavoidable, to hand ourselves over to all this futility in some ruinous but tender way: "The driver, / typical as suicide, is tied to the wheel /and headed for the life / I learn reluctantly to trust." In the midst of this mix of relutance and trust, of destination and the wayward drive toward it, Muratori’s poetry offers up a faint glimmer of elusiveness and ineffability that draws out some prospect of viability within the whole overdetermined, structurally overwhelming, decision driven mess. Even the language of these poems, so ornate and crystalline at points it could almost become chandelier, never neglects the agility words need so direly to express meaning in the face of this interdependence of predetermination and senselessness and that fact – along with the fleetness of his language in terms of its ever-alert arrangement in the text – means that his work is often nothing short of aeronautical, in the strictest sense of the word - each verse an airfoil creating differences in pressure so as to be able to maintain its flight.

Too little attention seems to have been cast Muratori’s way so I give my blog over to his work today. I hope whoever reads this, enjoys him.

***


Poems



Richard Oeleze, Die Erwatung 1935-36


1.

from Despite Repeated Warnings



Captures

Finally the evening
catches up with me.
I was smug at noon,
thinking I had lost
its scout, my shadow,
through the morning’s
plot of feints
and subtle dodges.
It crept back at one.
It was only having lunch.
By five it slipped ahead
of me, taunting,
and my eyes became
mistrustful as it pooled
in rifts and hollows.
Now the sun is falling
quite perceptibly
and the sky is scarred
with livid contrails.
The hills have lost
themselves within
a single spine, black
against the limit
of this world.
Caught again, as I
always will be,
I fail to discern
my hands and heartbeat
from the night. I only
live one life
but each day something
in it happens,
unrecollectable,
that almost makes me think
I almost got away.

***

Christ Brings Light to the Provinces

Light was all the rage that year
and when he claimed it
the populace fell round itself
concentrically in swoons
and offered him their loyalty,
their sons, their feisty goats.
Tired of stubbing their toes,
of groping for doorknobs in the dark,
they called on him to end them,
imagining the afterlife as advertised.

He only stood there, fragile
as a seahorse tooth, holding
their dogged love like a bag
filled with broken glass.
Then he walked right past them
till he came to the forest
of a nation without eyes or windows.
There, rising up on just one inhalation,
he smiled down benignly on the trees,
then burst the air sharply
like a ruptured hive of livid bees,
shedding scales and ashes
in a blizzard of redress.

***

The Psychiatrist to His Favorite Patient

Once you receive the heavy gloves,
the coat that whispers like a serpent
when you slide your arms along
its inner skin, there is no cause
I can make for you. I just wave
and pack the snow to slippery glass.

When the window skates down sharply
on your hand, breaking no bones
but reminding you that openness
is transient, a placebo for the guilty
then you’ll know the world can’t
love you always, or keep your diaries
secret anymore. I’ll help you find a road
that follows as it leads.

I know the pet names of the pharaohs,
and I know the names you call
your separate fingers, their quiet journeys,
their returns. It’s my job
to say you’re doing fine, keep trying.
It’s my feral pride, my prize deception.
When you listen and take heart, I’ll cast
my bones in random clutters with your own,
I’ll lose myself to you whenever you are lost.

***

The Stoic Tries to Help

I’ve eaten year-old steaks and lived,
forced myself to think
of nothing but infinity
yet kept my brains intact.

And though I’ve lost a score of loves
so deep they twined around
my bones like copper veins, I learned
again to relish sleep

and the American short story.
Don’t ask me how I do it.
There are no charms and aerosols
that I can recommend.

Next time you chase a midnight bus
or a woman who’s fled,
sobbing, from a restaurant you
picked, just look for someone
snickering nearby, his fingers
burning from the cigarette
he thinks he’s tossed away.

***

VITA POETICA

There are words I need.
They are not near men.
-- Charles Simic

Always just you and me, long after
everyone has eaten, after children hear
the whispered ever afters in their sleep
and lovers part to let their bodies dry
against designer-patterned sheets.

Just you and me, alone, awake
to meter out the lineation of our life
together, the slack and stress of it,
peripheries I barely sense
while you describe, or circumscribe.

There were – are – other men and women,
and other pacts made out of earshot
no less intimate or impossible, no more
desperate than ours, no more removed
from human pulse and commerce.

Sometimes I can’t remember what I am.
The night unfolds me like an unsigned
letter, lets me fall into a world worn
metal-slick and featureless by wind
and constant silence. I need you then

as I would have needed graceful arms
around my waist, a sleepy, reassuring kiss
below my ear, had things been different.
Defined in context by a touch, that life
would also be articulate, but wrong.

***

Despite Repeated Warnings

Catalpa trees converse in summer wind.
Imagine that they whisper hurricane
as leaves display their sequin sides and spin
wildly around, portending violent rain.
Our oldest instincts help enforce their hint:
the street is vacant as a lunar plain.
(Existence would rest lightly on the mind
if every omen were as well-defined.)

No slouch myself, I also run inside
and watch a film about an alien spore
that duplicates the human race, hiding
in basements, slowly taking human form
while people sleep (a kind of homicide
that kills the soul), becoming you before
you are yourself. Mother is not mother.
Each loved one is an odd, familiar other.

The breaking clouds pour out a hard white noise.
Above them, geosynchronous with earth,
a necklace of steel satellites hangs poised
in space. The images they send are worth
a thousand inner jolts: small Moslem boys
caressing automatic rifles, birth
defects near toxic sites – a longer list
would only overstate my gist,

and what good would more overstatement do?
We’ve seen our share of wailing women comb
through rubble for their sons, more than a few
recorded tests of the latest doomsday bomb.
If I’m no longer me, and you’re not you,
what can these signals mean to us, hearts numb
from life lived second-hand, the dreams we keep
as lovers growing monstrous as we sleep.

***

The Real Muse

He hovers at the back door,
biting his cigar, always buttoning,
unbuttoning, his raincoat.

He is nondescript, no long scars,
no fierce recession of the hairline.
When I approach him he acts

as if he owns the place: an impatience
with the lawn, that nailed-down look.
I’ve met his kind before.

The phone calls that precede them
are hysterical, cluttered with loud radios
and voices gathering coherence,

then the dial tone, the quiet.
They never mean me any good.
But now one waits for me again,

shadows darkening above his upper lip
as if the things he’s about to say
were burning their way through.

This time the stories have beginnings
and smell of incense, at times of brandy.
As I fall into his tales’ reach

he frisks me for an inner life,
leaves me wordless, mistaken,
one doorway from the perfect ending.

***

Dreaming of Connecticut

Even forests small as parking lots
are fidgety with game:
quail, pheasant,
the snide, reductive fox.
I could park anywhere. Instead
I stop my car beside a fractured elm.

As is typical of dreams, the street signs
have been switched. They’re written
in an alphabet of pumps and axes.
Just the same, this is home
as a liar might remember it.
I pass the pup tent I was crushed in
when the dying apple tree gave up
its heaviest limb,
and there, next to the house
some friends burned down for fun,
stands the doctor who delivered me,
the little girl he holds at gunpoint
cracking cough drops with her teeth.

Own up, Connecticut.
You were never like that.
You were the birch I stripped of bark,
Thinking Dead Sea Scrolls, papyrus
of the patriarchs
. You were
oak leaves in my shoes, mountain laurel,
hunks of hematite
discovered like doubloons, other kids
with names as long as mine.
Without you, I’d have never known
of Yankees, Charter Oak, what it means
to live so close to Yale and not get in.

I wake up in a room where a radiator
hisses me like Hamlet his mimes.
A change of clothes, a doughnut,
and I’m waiting in the snow for a bus,
its back end trailing gasoline
as an insect trails blood. The driver,
typical as suicide, is tied to the wheel
and headed for the life
I learn reluctantly to trust.

<<<>>>


2.

poems after 1994



On the Third Day

Subsidence left the continents, their cooling chimneys
dry and black against the newly-reddened atmosphere.
We have only myths as witnesses, like second minds
that know before we know yet ride our stooping shoulders
down the parrot dark, keeping silent as we strike out
to the left or right, both directions bent for sadness.
Regret was not invented or designed from need. It
was crosshatched in our molecules, embedded in soil,
waiting for attention. Choices, choices. Our hearts swoon
as if from joy or late Cretaceous winds. What can we do
to keep from being inevitable? We can create
the past that would've happened. You remember: sunlight
through the seams and contradictions, a yellow jungle
of geometry beyond the kitchen door, a breathing
sky. Ours, nearly ours. We did insist it in our bones.

***

Birdwatching

By the fountain people gather to examine it.
Its feathers heighten in the breeze, and the dogwood twig
it perches on sways, but the bird stays, examining
them back. I have never seen such colors says the man
whose dusty hat has blown across canyons and rested
in the shadows of fiery buttes. A woman whose dress
waves smoothly as a field of blue alfalfa before
a hailstorm says, It must be rare because it calms me..
Others nod and hum agreement without meaning to.
Two children, one of whom will see a planet not yet
known to us, run hide-and-seek among their parents' legs
and will not remember this moment, which plays no role
in the shaping of their souls. The bird raises its head
and takes flight, its wake a gold hem on the rolling air.
The people go their ways, bearing a fatal anger.

***

Examined Life

Meditation augurs failure. To huddle inward
means a station missed, cuffs uncaught on thorns intended
to present the rose, Charybdis hidden under ponds
of Monet's lily pads, under love too foolishly
professed. Had the world been cast for our amusement,
our enterprise and lust, we'd never heed our minds,
their interruptive voices like a mother's call to milk
and softened sheets, the bed from which we would not wake.
Our eyes would glide through blurring vistas, purposeful
but willing to be lured if new transgressions meant new
sight. Now every vantage snares us, words set words in chain
reaction through our heads until associations
blunt to proof, intentions dress as acts: a severed life
packed and waiting for two cabs. Configure it this way:
the rain mists lightly on a street, our minds wander.

***

The Obvious

Know the obvious or fear it. Why pretend the air
is empty? Here in our acute democracy each
person occupies a piece, then leaves it for the next,
undiminished or good as new -- or better -- with scents
of soap and lightly sauteed onions. Try striding through
5th Avenue at Christmas time and notice air change
hands, the street become a centipede of opposite
intents, flowing pros and cons in search of an hypothesis.
You might pass the very soul who knows what's innermost
about you -- what you force out of your mind at dawn
or else start work an animal. Look, there goes salvation
in a pair of skintight jeans! You missed it but it was
beautiful, and meant for you, its body heat still hanging
in the waiting space. We take the emptiness for fact,
that flagrant vacuum, so plainly personless, a guise.

***

The Appearances

Time takes shape or seems to only as it disappears:
a tulip lost in fields of matted weeds, something in
the eye that exits only when the weeping starts,
when other, better selves work free of sublimation,
telling us they could have, could have been had we become
them as we'd wished, before the wishes stopped and turned to
day on day on day of movement for the sake of movement,
an army of alternatives dismissed for want of interest.
The layering continues, the coarse protective strata
build until the earth is no more than a muffled
pied-a-terre equipped with beds and mirrors, shades and
dead bolt locks, its clocks all hurrying to start again.
Some people have their memories embossed or bronzed or
published as if true, still fish poured from buckets over
ice for our consumption, so alien we think they move.

***

Bachelors

Devoid of daughters here, for each of them is fated
to the tabletop as though to white Moroccan sand
and heads lift not to light but only to shadow,
passing motion just a flicker on the iris
which washes out to rim unfeelingly, mechanical,
the ball-and-socket block-and-tackle clockwork
meshing at a level so interior and unsurmised few
instruments can plumb its measure. Listen flush
with them to no essential music but the brush
of silver knives on china, sighs well-spersed
and nectar slow. Admire linen suits unchinked
by accident or faux pas at the velvet rope. Say
nothing on your way home of the love remaindered,
of air that seems euphoria spread thin enough
to pass for struggle, or for struggle that has ended.

***


More of Muratori's poetry can be found here and here and here and here.

<<<>>>


3.

from Muratori's new work in progress, Nothing in the Dark, a prose-poem noir:


News today that more planets have been discovered. Of course astronomers don't see them as they might gold or turquoise spheres in a telescope's lens, as ringed and polar-capped ball bearings circling orange suns. These planets are no more than infinitesimal but consistent diminishings of invisible light read by state-of-the-art sensors and transmuted to a binary code interpreted wishfully as "planet." My apprehension of the events around me is no more direct, an empiricism of derived and interpreted impulses. I observe, I act, I observe myself acting, I record the observations in something approximating a dream diary. I discover evidence, connections that can't be diagrammed, only assumed from variations in the patterned behaviors of others. Two of Felice's fingernails are chipped. They were not chipped yesterday. Something has happened. Something new has entered the known universe, and once again that universe is open to question.

*


Extreme actions can be motivated by nothing stronger than a desire for change. A wife poisons a husband or a husband shoots a wife, and afterwards, in court, will make a point of saying It was nothing personal; I just couldn't live like that anymore. The human race invents new definitions for like that every day: I couldn't stand being trapped another minute. I couldn't live knowing that the present was my future. I couldn't go on being the one less loved. I couldn't stand feeling like the center of someone else's universe. Your like that is probably in there somewhere, growing in the back of your mind right now, like interest on an unwise loan.

*


The apartment was empty except for some worn and sagging furniture, a few blurry prints of Impressionist paintings, and an ancient, cabinet-style record player. The man I needed to question had left so quickly that he'd forgotten to turn it off. Amid the record's scratches and pops, I recognized the music: Bill Evans playing "My Foolish Heart" at the Village Vanguard. Sweet, sad, fragile on top, knowing and resilient underneath. It was the song you played for your date once both of you knew this would be the night you'd sleep together for the first time. It was also the song you'd play alone in the middle of the night of the day she told you that it was over. Judging from the open bottle of Jack Daniels on the battered night stand and the overturned shot glass on the carpet, the presence of a single, aluminum frozen dinner tray in the trash, I guessed the latter scenario. Maybe I didn't need to find and interrogate him, after all. Maybe he didn't know anything I hadn't already figured out. I left the apartment with an unsettled feeling, angry at myself for empathizing so readily with a stranger whose only connection to me was a few notes on a piano played decades ago by someone long dead. I walked home in double time, needing a drink, wanting as much as I'd wanted anything to hear that song again from beginning to end.

*


My dreams nearly always have endings—clear denouements in which I am either proven to be right or wrong, final moments in which the previous millisecond's surreal mysteries are explained in a flurry of prepositions and pipe smoke. Mundane as it sounds, I dream of my work, of who I am when I am awake, although my dream-self occasionally wears large rubber masks in imitation of wolves or lizards. This morning, for example, just before I woke to the yellow tetrahedron of sun on my bedroom wall, my dream ended with myself and a short, portly Englishman jovially discussing our brilliant solution to the case of the purloined radish. Each of us seemed far too willing to share credit for this little triumph, and had the situation occurred in real life, I would have been troubled. One of us would be hiding something. But no, since the context was completely fanciful, we could be nothing but two thoroughly humble and honest men who breathed water and spoke a language resembling Russian heard through a plastic tube, rewarded enough by the simple fact that we had once more made it through till dawn without sacrificing a single grain of sand.

**


More here and here and here.

<<<>>>

Saturday, May 31, 2008



One time I got so desperate at being how I am inside my own head, at being so convolutedly caught up inside of it and knowing all the while that the convolution is only me, so that to finally sort it all out would be to simply figure myself out to be nothing at all, one time I got so desperate at all of that, you see, so fed up with seeing that this was my only way of ever being inside of my own head, that I snapped and smashed a glass against the side of it. What amazed me, though, what still amazes me, is that it did no damage. In fact, it didn’t even leave a bruise. I must have driven that thing into the side of my head with all the force my arms could gather. My arms are weak but not that weak. Still, not a mark was made upon me. When I saw that I had literally not altered myself one bit as a result of such a violent, propulsive, spontaneous act, when I realised I had cut myself nowhere even though the glass had shattered so jaggedly and haphazardly against me, I was dumbstruck. Many things fell away in that moment, in a confetti of shimmering pieces, as if they had never even impacted upon me at all, indeed as if their irrelevance had been prearranged. Not even a bruise, I said again later as I looked at myself in the mirror. I was that lucky. That luck says everything to me, really, about how far away I still am from a solution of any lasting kind. And it tells you all you need to know about how it is I could become so attenuated as to actually smash a glass against my head in the first place.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

five (for tom moore)




"A philosopher went for a walk under some trees and remained silent, because inspiration had deserted him."
-- Danil Kharms

1.

appeal

there’s a boy
in my dorm
we’d all die
to have
sex with.

he looks
like
an emo
owl.

**

2.

believer

i wrote your name
in my margins,

and prayed you knew
i existed,

but you were
lost in
some other lie
else.

**

3.

sadness

my head feels like
a cabbage,

it’s so leafy
and dumb.

it won’t even wish
it was dead.

**

4.

subjectivity

the milk had gone off
but i drank it all the
same.

it was thicker than
usual and it glued up
in my throat.

i dreamt that it
tasted like
cum.

**

5.

shallow

when you gaze long into
the abyss, the abyss
gazes also into
you.

so,

i can only see
as deep as myself.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

mirage patrol



I woke up from what
turned out to be
a very bad dream.
It had you in it.

You were hanging
by your fingertips
from a really steep
ledge,

above a city
made strictly of
churches.

I thought it was
up to me to save
you and so I ran
as hard as I could
to get to you,

so hard in fact
my throat was
wheezing.

But when I got
to the ledge
you weren’t
there anymore.

All that was left
of you was a letter
that said

'look down'.

I did.

I looked and I saw
you still weren’t there;
nothing was.

I expected to see a
body or blood
or at least the ground
beneath me but all
that was there
was a glaring white
nothingness.

Then I saw that was
exactly your point.